How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. H6521ABD vs TK800M

Acer H6521ABD vs BenQ TK800M

What H6521ABD does better (4) and where TK800M wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Acer H6521ABD
Acer · 2018H6521ABD
4.0Score
4 advantages
Higher score
vs
BenQ TK800M
BenQ · 2019TK800M
3 advantages≈ US$840
4.7Picture6.8

Why is H6521ABD better than TK800M?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,500 lm vs 3,000 lm+17%
  2. Native panel resolution1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  3. Optical zoom2× vs 1.1×+82%
  4. Weight2.8 kg vs 4.2 kg+50%

Why is TK800M better than H6521ABD?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
  2. HDR supportNo · H6521ABD: Yes
  3. Fan noise34 dB vs 33 dB+3%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ TK800MBenQ TK800M≈ US$840
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1200 (WUXGA)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method—4K by pixel shifting
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLampLamp
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,500 lm3,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)10,000:1—
HDR supportNoYes
HDR formats—HDR10, HLG
3D playbackYesYes
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate120 Hz—
Game / low-latency mode—Yes
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.47:11.5:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.62:11.65:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.25 m3.32 m
Smallest image size28″—
Largest image size300″—
Optical zoom2×1.1×
AutofocusNo—
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)3 W—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
HDMI version1.4—
USB portYes—
Ethernet (LAN)No—
VGA inputYesYes
Audio outputNo—
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption300 W—
Light source life3,500 h—
Light source life (eco mode)10,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise34 dB33 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)27 dB—
Weight2.8 kg4.2 kg
Width—353 mm
Height—135 mm
Depth—272 mm
ColoursWhite—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare