How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. H6531BDi vs NeoPix 750

Acer H6531BDi vs Philips NeoPix 750

What H6531BDi does better (2) and where NeoPix 750 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Acer H6531BDi
Acer · 2024H6531BDi
5.4Score
2 advantages≈ US$540
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 750
Philips · 2024NeoPix 750
2 advantages≈ US$610
Dimensions

Size comparison

H6531BDiNeoPix 750
313 × 106255305 × 119319
H6531BDiNeoPix 750Difference
Height106 mm119 mm−13 mm
Width313 mm305 mm+8 mm
Depth255 mm319 mm−64 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is H6531BDi better than NeoPix 750?

  1. Largest image size305″ vs 120″2.5×
  2. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×

Why is NeoPix 750 better than H6531BDi?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)3 W vs 14 W4.7×
  2. Light source life5,000 h vs 30,000 h6×
Specifications

Side by side

Acer H6531BDiAcer H6531BDi≈ US$5405.4
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLPLCD (single panel)
Light sourceLamp—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)5,200 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)10,000:1—
HDR supportNo—
3D playbackYes—
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate120 Hz—
Lens & placement
Smallest image size28″—
Largest image size305″120″
Optical zoom2×—
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusNoNo
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)3 W14 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYesYes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs21
HDMI version1.4—
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption290 W—
Light source life5,000 h30,000 h
Light source life (eco mode)10,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise (eco mode)27 dB—
Weight2.95 kg—
Width313 mm305 mm
Height106 mm119 mm
Depth255 mm319 mm
ColoursWhiteWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare