- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- H6822BD vs QT12
Acer H6822BD vs Acer QT12
What H6822BD does better (4) and where QT12 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is H6822BD better than QT12?
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
- Audio outputYes · QT12: No
Why is QT12 better than H6822BD?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm vs 6,500 lm+62%
- Light source life5,000 h vs 6,500 h+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | — |
| Display technology | DLP | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 4,000 lm | 6,500 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 10,000:1 | — |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| 3D playback | Yes | — |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 240 Hz | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.5:1 | — |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.65:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.32 m | — |
| Smallest image size | 27″ | — |
| Largest image size | 300″ | — |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 3 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 310 W | — |
| Light source life | 5,000 h | 6,500 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | 10,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 33 dB | — |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 30 dB | — |
| Weight | 2.9 kg | — |
| Width | 322 mm | — |
| Height | 94 mm | — |
| Depth | 225 mm | — |
| Colours | White | White |
