- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- H6830BD vs DLA-NZ900
Acer H6830BD vs JVC DLA-NZ900
What H6830BD does better (2) and where DLA-NZ900 wins (5) — every spec side by side.
Why is H6830BD better than DLA-NZ900?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm vs 3,300 lm+21%
- Power consumption310 W vs 440 W+42%
Why is DLA-NZ900 better than H6830BD?
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K)
- Light source life10,000 h vs 20,000 h2×
- Fan noise30 dB vs 24 dB+25%
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K)
- 4K method4K by pixel shifting vs Native 4K
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | Native 4K |
| Display technology | DLP | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) |
| Light source | LED | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 4,000 lm | 3,300 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 150,000:1 |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG |
| 3D playback | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.28:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 2.61:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.83 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 60″ |
| Largest image size | — | 300″ |
| Optical zoom | — | 2× |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | — | 2 |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | Yes |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | — | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 310 W | 440 W |
| Light source life | 10,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | 5,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 30 dB | 24 dB |
| Weight | — | 25.3 kg |
| Width | 322 mm | 500 mm |
| Height | — | 234 mm |
| Depth | 225 mm | 528 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
