- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- HL1810U vs EF-22
Acer HL1810U vs Epson EF-22
What HL1810U does better (1) and where EF-22 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is HL1810U better than EF-22?
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Why is EF-22 better than HL1810U?
EF-22 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | — |
| Display technology | DLP | 3LCD |
| Light source | RGB triple laser | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 1,000 lm | 1,000 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 5,000,000:1 |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 1.82:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 2.21 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 30″ |
| Largest image size | — | 150″ |
| Optical zoom | — | 1.82× |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 5 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Chromecast built-in | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | — | 1 |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 75 W |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | — | 22 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 18 dB |
| Weight | — | 3 kg |
| Width | — | 236 mm |
| Height | — | 193 mm |
| Depth | — | 191 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
