How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. HL6512i vs NEBULA

Acer HL6512i vs Nebula NEBULA

What HL6512i does better (3) and where NEBULA wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Acer HL6512i
Acer · 2026HL6512i
6.9Score
3 advantages≈ US$750
Higher score
vs
Nebula NEBULA
Nebula · 2026NEBULA
0 advantages
7.1Picture3.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

HL6512iNEBULA
322 × 225109183 × 230204
HL6512iNEBULADifference
Height225 mm230 mm−5 mm
Width322 mm183 mm+139 mm
Depth109 mm204 mm−95 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is HL6512i better than NEBULA?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm vs 1,500 lm2.7×
  2. Light source life20,000 h vs 1,500 h13.3×
  3. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,500,000:1 vs 1,500:12,333.3×

Why is NEBULA better than HL6512i?

NEBULA has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Acer HL6512iAcer HL6512i≈ US$7506.9
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLaserLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm1,500 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)3,500,000:11,500:1
HDR supportYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.5:1—
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.65:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.32 m—
Smallest image size30″—
Largest image size300″—
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusNo—
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W—
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiYes—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs2—
HDMI version2—
USB portYes—
Ethernet (LAN)No—
VGA inputNo—
Audio outputYes—
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption195 W—
Light source life20,000 h1,500 h
Light source life (eco mode)30,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise (eco mode)29 dB—
Weight3.3 kg—
Width322 mm183 mm
Height225 mm230 mm
Depth109 mm204 mm
ColoursWhiteGrey, Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare