- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- HL6810ATV vs TH575C
Acer HL6810ATV vs BenQ TH575C
What HL6810ATV does better (2) and where TH575C wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
HL6810ATVTH575C
| HL6810ATV | TH575C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 119 mm | 120 mm | −1 mm |
| Width | 304 mm | 296 mm | +8 mm |
| Depth | 226 mm | 237 mm | −11 mm |
| Weight | 3 kg | 2.3 kg | +0.7 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is HL6810ATV better than TH575C?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm vs 3,800 lm+5%
- Fan noise29 dB vs 34 dB+17%
Why is TH575C better than HL6810ATV?
- Weight3 kg vs 2.3 kg+30%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | — |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | — |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | — |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Laser | Lamp |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 4,000 lm | 3,800 lm |
| 3D playback | — | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 240 Hz | — |
| Game / low-latency mode | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.15:1 | 1.49:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.5:1 | 1.64:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.55 m | 3.3 m |
| Optical zoom | — | 1.1× |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | — | 1 |
| HDMI version | 2 | — |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 250 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | — |
| Light source life (eco mode) | 30,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 29 dB | 34 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 29 dB | — |
| Weight | 3 kg | 2.3 kg |
| Width | 304 mm | 296 mm |
| Height | 119 mm | 120 mm |
| Depth | 226 mm | 237 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
