How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. HL6810ATV vs EH-QL7000

Acer HL6810ATV vs Epson EH-QL7000

What HL6810ATV does better (1) and where EH-QL7000 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Acer HL6810ATV
Acer · 2026HL6810ATV
9.6Score
1 advantage
Higher score
vs
Epson EH-QL7000
Epson · 2025EH-QL7000
1 advantage≈ US$25,000
9.1Picture9.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

HL6810ATVEH-QL7000
304 × 119226568 × 192568
HL6810ATVEH-QL7000Difference
Height119 mm192 mm−73 mm
Width304 mm568 mm−264 mm
Depth226 mm568 mm−342 mm
Weight3 kg21.1 kg−18.1 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is HL6810ATV better than EH-QL7000?

  1. Weight3 kg vs 21.1 kg7×

Why is EH-QL7000 better than HL6810ATV?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm vs 10,000 lm2.5×
Specifications

Side by side

Epson EH-QL7000Epson EH-QL7000≈ US$25,000
Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method4K by pixel shifting4K by pixel shifting
Display technologyDLP3LCD
Light sourceLaserLaser
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm10,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—3,000:1
HDR support—Yes
HDR formats—HDR10
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate240 Hz—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.15:1—
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.5:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.55 m—
AutofocusNo—
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—No
Connectivity
HDMI inputs—2
HDMI version2—
USB port—Yes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA input—No
Audio output—Yes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption250 W—
Light source life20,000 h20,000 h
Light source life (eco mode)30,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise29 dB—
Fan noise (eco mode)29 dB—
Weight3 kg21.1 kg
Width304 mm568 mm
Height119 mm192 mm
Depth226 mm568 mm
ColoursWhite—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare