- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- HL6810ATV vs Kid Cat
Acer HL6810ATV vs Kiano Kid Cat
What HL6810ATV does better (2) and where Kid Cat wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is HL6810ATV better than Kid Cat?
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
Why is Kid Cat better than HL6810ATV?
Kid Cat has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | — |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | Laser | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 4,000 lm | — |
| HDR support | — | No |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 240 Hz | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.15:1 | — |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.5:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.55 m | — |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| AirPlay | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | — | 1 |
| HDMI version | 2 | — |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | — | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 250 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | — |
| Light source life (eco mode) | 30,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 29 dB | — |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 29 dB | — |
| Weight | 3 kg | — |
| Width | 304 mm | — |
| Height | 119 mm | — |
| Depth | 226 mm | — |
| Colours | White | — |
