- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- M511 vs Halo+ GTV
Acer M511 vs XGIMI Halo+ GTV
What M511 does better (7) and where Halo+ GTV wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is M511 better than Halo+ GTV?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,300 lm vs 900 lm4.8×
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)10,000:1 vs 200:150×
- Largest image size301″ vs 120″2.5×
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Ethernet (LAN)Yes · Halo+ GTV: No
- Audio outputYes · Halo+ GTV: No
Why is Halo+ GTV better than M511?
- Weight3 kg vs 1.6 kg+88%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Lamp | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 4,300 lm | 900 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 10,000:1 | 200:1 |
| 3D playback | Yes | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.49:1 | 1.2:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.67:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.3 m | 2.66 m |
| Largest image size | 301″ | 120″ |
| Optical zoom | 1.12× | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | No |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 295 W | — |
| Light source life | — | 25,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 27 dB | — |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 24 dB | — |
| Weight | 3 kg | 1.6 kg |
| Width | 313 mm | — |
| Height | 114 mm | — |
| Depth | 240 mm | — |
| Colours | White | Grey |
