- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- S1286H vs TK800M
Acer S1286H vs BenQ TK800M
What S1286H does better (4) and where TK800M wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is S1286H better than TK800M?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,500 lm vs 3,000 lm+17%
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Fan noise32 dB vs 33 dB+3%
- Weight3.1 kg vs 4.2 kg+35%
Why is TK800M better than S1286H?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) vs 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1200 (WUXGA) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | — | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | — | Lamp |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 3,500 lm | 3,000 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 20,000:1 | — |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10, HLG |
| 3D playback | — | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Game / low-latency mode | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.5:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | — | 1.65:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.32 m |
| Optical zoom | — | 1.1× |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 16 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | No | — |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | — |
| VGA input | No | Yes |
| Audio output | No | — |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 270 W | — |
| Light source life | 5,000 h | — |
| Light source life (eco mode) | 6,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 32 dB | 33 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 24 dB | — |
| Weight | 3.1 kg | 4.2 kg |
| Width | — | 353 mm |
| Height | — | 135 mm |
| Depth | — | 272 mm |
| Colours | White | — |
