- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- SL2820n Vero vs GT2200HDR
Acer SL2820n Vero vs Optoma GT2200HDR
What SL2820n Vero does better (2) and where GT2200HDR wins (0) — every spec side by side.
9.1Picture4.6
Why is SL2820n Vero better than GT2200HDR?
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm vs 3,300 lm+21%
Why is GT2200HDR better than SL2820n Vero?
GT2200HDR has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | — |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | — | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 4,000 lm | 3,300 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 500,000:1 |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 2:1 | 2:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 4.43 m | 4.43 m |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | 2 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Design & noise | ||
| Colours | — | Black |
