- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- X139Wi vs TH575C
Acer X139Wi vs BenQ TH575C
What X139Wi does better (2) and where TH575C wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
X139WiTH575C
| X139Wi | TH575C | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 114 mm | 120 mm | −6 mm |
| Width | 313 mm | 296 mm | +17 mm |
| Depth | 240 mm | 237 mm | +3 mm |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.3 kg | +0.5 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is X139Wi better than TH575C?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)5,000 lm vs 3,800 lm+32%
- Fan noise27 dB vs 34 dB+26%
Why is TH575C better than X139Wi?
- Weight2.8 kg vs 2.3 kg+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Lamp | Lamp |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 5,000 lm | 3,800 lm |
| 3D playback | Yes | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Game / low-latency mode | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.49:1 | 1.49:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.67:1 | 1.64:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.3 m | 3.3 m |
| Optical zoom | 1.12× | 1.1× |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| VGA input | Yes | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 27 dB | 34 dB |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.3 kg |
| Width | 313 mm | 296 mm |
| Height | 114 mm | 120 mm |
| Depth | 240 mm | 237 mm |
