How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. X139Wi vs NeoPix 520

Acer X139Wi vs Philips NeoPix 520

What X139Wi does better (1) and where NeoPix 520 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Acer X139Wi
Acer · 2025X139Wi
1 advantage≈ US$480
vs
Philips NeoPix 520
Philips · 2022NeoPix 520
8.6Score
2 advantages≈ US$480
Higher score
Dimensions

Size comparison

X139WiNeoPix 520
313 × 114240274 × 107294
X139WiNeoPix 520Difference
Height114 mm107 mm+7 mm
Width313 mm274 mm+39 mm
Depth240 mm294 mm−54 mm
Weight2.8 kg2.4 kg+0.4 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is X139Wi better than NeoPix 520?

  1. Automatic keystone correctionYes · NeoPix 520: No

Why is NeoPix 520 better than X139Wi?

  1. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
  2. Weight2.8 kg vs 2.4 kg+17%
Specifications

Side by side

Acer X139WiAcer X139Wi≈ US$480
Philips NeoPix 520Philips NeoPix 520≈ US$4808.6
Picture
Resolution (on screen)—1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution—1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLP—
Light sourceLampLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)5,000 lm—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—3,000:1
3D playbackYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.49:11.43:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.67:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.3 m3.17 m
Largest image size—100″
Optical zoom1.12×—
Lens shift—None
Autofocus—No
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionYesNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—14 W
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
USB port—Yes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA inputYesNo
Audio output—Yes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—100 W
Light source life—30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise27 dB—
Weight2.8 kg2.4 kg
Width313 mm274 mm
Height114 mm107 mm
Depth240 mm294 mm
Colours—Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare