- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- Fire Legend QH15s vs L1
AOpen Fire Legend QH15s vs Yaber L1
What Fire Legend QH15s does better (4) and where L1 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
Fire Legend QH15sL1
| Fire Legend QH15s | L1 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 204 mm | 118 mm | +86 mm |
| Width | 103 mm | 160 mm | −57 mm |
| Depth | 103 mm | 125 mm | −22 mm |
| Weight | 0.6 kg | 1 kg | −0.3 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is Fire Legend QH15s better than L1?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Light source life30,000 h vs 20,000 h+50%
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Weight0.62 kg vs 0.96 kg+55%
Why is L1 better than Fire Legend QH15s?
L1 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Display technology | — | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 180 lm | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.25:1 | — |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.87:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.77 m | — |
| Lens shift | Vertical and horizontal | — |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | 1.4 | — |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 65 W |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 0.62 kg | 0.96 kg |
| Width | 103 mm | 160 mm |
| Height | 204 mm | 118 mm |
| Depth | 103 mm | 125 mm |
| Colours | White | White, Black |
