- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- L20 by Acer vs NeoPix 100
AOpen L20 by Acer vs Philips NeoPix 100
What L20 by Acer does better (3) and where NeoPix 100 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is L20 by Acer better than NeoPix 100?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
- Largest image size100″ vs 65″+54%
Why is NeoPix 100 better than L20 by Acer?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1 vs 3,000:13×
- Weight0.9 kg vs 0.8 kg+12%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,000:1 | 3,000:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.47:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.25 m |
| Smallest image size | 30″ | — |
| Largest image size | 100″ | 65″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 6 W | 6 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | Yes |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 30,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 0.9 kg | 0.8 kg |
| Width | — | 158 mm |
| Height | — | 205 mm |
| Depth | — | 78 mm |
| Colours | Grey, Black | White |
