- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- L20 by Acer vs Neopix 130
AOpen L20 by Acer vs Philips Neopix 130
What L20 by Acer does better (3) and where Neopix 130 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.5Setup & placement7.5
Why is L20 by Acer better than Neopix 130?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1 vs 500:12×
- Weight0.9 kg vs 1.5 kg+67%
- Largest image size100″ vs 70″+43%
Why is Neopix 130 better than L20 by Acer?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- AutofocusNo · L20 by Acer: Yes
- Built-in speakers (total output)6 W vs 10 W+67%
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 120 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,000:1 | 500:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | 30″ | — |
| Largest image size | 100″ | 70″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | No | Yes |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 6 W | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 0.9 kg | 1.5 kg |
| Width | — | 141 mm |
| Height | — | 162 mm |
| Depth | — | 123 mm |
| Colours | Grey, Black | — |
