- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- L20 by Acer vs TX-177
AOpen L20 by Acer vs Technaxx TX-177
What L20 by Acer does better (2) and where TX-177 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.5Setup & placement5.6
Why is L20 by Acer better than TX-177?
- Built-in speakers (total output)6 W vs 3 W2×
- Weight0.9 kg vs 1.36 kg+51%
Why is TX-177 better than L20 by Acer?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Light source life30,000 h vs 40,000 h+33%
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Largest image size100″ vs 200″2×
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1 vs 1,500:1+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,000:1 | 1,500:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | 30″ | 50″ |
| Largest image size | 100″ | 200″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 6 W | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 70 W |
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 40,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 0.9 kg | 1.36 kg |
| Width | — | 187 mm |
| Height | — | 96 mm |
| Depth | — | 234 mm |
| Colours | Grey, Black | White |
