How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. PV12a vs NeoPix Ace

AOpen PV12a vs Philips NeoPix Ace

What PV12a does better (3) and where NeoPix Ace wins (6) — every spec side by side.

AOpen PV12a
AOpen · 2022PV12a
7.5Score
3 advantages≈ US$330
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix Ace
Philips · 2020NeoPix Ace
6 advantages≈ US$280
6.2Setup & placement2.8

Why is PV12a better than NeoPix Ace?

  1. AutofocusYes · NeoPix Ace: No
  2. Audio outputYes · NeoPix Ace: No
  3. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)5,000:1 vs 3,000:1+67%

Why is NeoPix Ace better than PV12a?

  1. Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  2. Light source life20,000 h vs 30,000 h+50%
  3. Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
  4. Wi-FiNo · PV12a: Yes
  5. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
  6. Largest image size100″ vs 120″+20%
Specifications

Side by side

AOpen PV12aAOpen PV12a≈ US$3307.5
Picture
Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)800 lm—
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)—4,200 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)5,000:13,000:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.3:11.4:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.88 m3.1 m
Smallest image size30″20″
Largest image size100″120″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusYesNo
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)2 W—
Smart & streaming
Wi-FiNoYes
BluetoothYesYes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
USB portYesNo
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoYes
Audio outputYesNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Built-in batteryYes—
Power consumption30 W—
Light source life20,000 h30,000 h
Light source life (eco mode)30,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise29 dB—
Fan noise (eco mode)25 dB—
Weight0.4 kg—
Width115 mm—
Height115 mm—
Depth36 mm—
Colours—Silver, Black
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare