- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QF12 vs Astro
AOpen QF12 vs Nebula Astro
What QF12 does better (0) and where Astro wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
QF12Astro
| QF12 | Astro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 92 mm | 91 mm | +1 mm |
| Width | 232 mm | 89 mm | +143 mm |
| Depth | 168 mm | 82 mm | +86 mm |
| Weight | 1.3 kg | 0.4 kg | +0.9 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is QF12 better than Astro?
QF12 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Astro better than QF12?
- Weight1.3 kg vs 0.38 kg3.4×
- Fan noise33 dB vs 30 dB+10%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | — |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | — |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 100 lm | 100 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,000:1 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.3:1 | 1.39:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.88 m | 3.08 m |
| Largest image size | 150″ | — |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 5 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | — |
| VGA input | No | — |
| Audio output | Yes | — |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | — | Yes |
| Power consumption | 65 W | — |
| Light source life | 50,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 33 dB | 30 dB |
| Weight | 1.3 kg | 0.38 kg |
| Width | 232 mm | 89 mm |
| Height | 92 mm | 91 mm |
| Depth | 168 mm | 82 mm |
| Colours | White, Gold | — |
