How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. QF12 vs Neopix 130

AOpen QF12 vs Philips Neopix 130

What QF12 does better (4) and where Neopix 130 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

AOpen QF12
AOpen · 2021QF12
4.4Score
4 advantages≈ US$160
vs
Philips Neopix 130
Philips · 2024Neopix 130
5.8Score
2 advantages≈ US$150
Higher score
3.2Picture3.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

QF12Neopix 130
232 × 92168141 × 162123
QF12Neopix 130Difference
Height92 mm162 mm−70 mm
Width232 mm141 mm+91 mm
Depth168 mm123 mm+45 mm
Weight1.3 kg1.5 kg−0.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is QF12 better than Neopix 130?

  1. Light source life50,000 h vs 30,000 h+67%
  2. Largest image size150″ vs 70″2.1×
  3. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1 vs 500:12×
  4. Weight1.3 kg vs 1.5 kg+15%

Why is Neopix 130 better than QF12?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)5 W vs 10 W2×
  2. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)100 lm vs 120 lm+20%
Specifications

Side by side

AOpen QF12AOpen QF12≈ US$1604.4
Philips Neopix 130Philips Neopix 130≈ US$1505.8
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technology—DLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)100 lm120 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1500:1
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.3:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.88 m—
Largest image size150″70″
Lens shiftNoneNone
Autofocus—Yes
Keystone correction—Yes
Automatic keystone correction—Yes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)5 W10 W
Smart & streaming
Netflix (officially licensed)—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption65 W—
Light source life50,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise33 dB—
Weight1.3 kg1.5 kg
Width232 mm141 mm
Height92 mm162 mm
Depth168 mm123 mm
ColoursWhite, Gold—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare