- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QF13s vs Luma 400 tragbarer HD
AOpen QF13s vs Kodak Luma 400 tragbarer HD
What QF13s does better (5) and where Luma 400 tragbarer HD wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.0Picture3.0
Why is QF13s better than Luma 400 tragbarer HD?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Light source life100,000 h vs 3,500 h28.6×
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)280 lm vs 200 lm+40%
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Audio outputYes · Luma 400 tragbarer HD: No
Why is Luma 400 tragbarer HD better than QF13s?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)1,000:1 vs 3,500:13.5×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 280 lm | 200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,000:1 | 3,500:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Largest image size | 165″ | — |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 5 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | No | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 100,000 h | 3,500 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 1.9 kg | — |
| Width | 239 mm | — |
| Height | 138 mm | — |
| Depth | 189 mm | — |
| Colours | White | Black, White |
