- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QF18s vs NeoPix 113
AOpen QF18s vs Philips NeoPix 113
What QF18s does better (5) and where NeoPix 113 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
vs
Why is QF18s better than NeoPix 113?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 3 W3.3×
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Ethernet (LAN)Yes · NeoPix 113: No
- Largest image size120″ vs 65″+85%
Why is NeoPix 113 better than QF18s?
NeoPix 113 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 800 lm | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.23:1 | 1.47:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.72 m | 3.25 m |
| Smallest image size | 55″ | 65″ |
| Largest image size | 120″ | 65″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | Yes | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 0.4 kg |
| Colours | Black | Black |
