- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- QF23s vs Neopix 130
AOpen QF23s vs Philips Neopix 130
What QF23s does better (2) and where Neopix 130 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
vs
5.2Picture3.2
Why is QF23s better than Neopix 130?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)250 lm vs 120 lm2.1×
- Largest image size120″ vs 70″+71%
Why is Neopix 130 better than QF23s?
- Built-in speakers (total output)6 W vs 10 W+67%
- Audio outputNo · QF23s: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | — | DLP |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 250 lm | 120 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 500:1 |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | 40″ | — |
| Largest image size | 120″ | 70″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 6 W | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Netflix (officially licensed) | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 30,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | — | 1.5 kg |
| Width | — | 141 mm |
| Height | — | 162 mm |
| Depth | — | 123 mm |
