How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. ZenBeam E1R vs PicoPix Micro 2TV

Asus ZenBeam E1R vs Philips PicoPix Micro 2TV

What ZenBeam E1R does better (3) and where PicoPix Micro 2TV wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Asus ZenBeam E1R
Asus · 2023ZenBeam E1R
6.2Score
3 advantages≈ US$350
Higher score
vs
Philips PicoPix Micro 2TV
Philips · 2021PicoPix Micro 2TV
3.8Score
1 advantage≈ US$390
3.6Picture2.5
6.8Setup & placement6.2

Why is ZenBeam E1R better than PicoPix Micro 2TV?

  1. Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
  2. Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
  3. Largest image size120″ vs 100″+20%

Why is PicoPix Micro 2TV better than ZenBeam E1R?

  1. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)500:1 vs 600:1+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Asus ZenBeam E1RAsus ZenBeam E1R≈ US$3506.2
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)854 × 480 (480p)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)854 × 480 (480p)
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm200 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)500:1600:1
HDR supportNo—
3D playbackYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1:11.2:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.2:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.21 m2.66 m
Smallest image size16″—
Largest image size120″100″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusNoNo
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionYesYes
Smart & streaming
Smart platform—Android (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platform—Yes
Wi-FiYesYes
Voice assistant—Google Assistant
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Built-in battery—Yes
Power consumption45 W—
Light source life30,000 h30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise30 dB—
Weight0.31 kg—
Width108 mm—
Height84 mm—
Depth29 mm—
ColoursSilverBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare