- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- ZenBeam Latte L1 vs Luma 350
Asus ZenBeam Latte L1 vs Kodak Luma 350
What ZenBeam Latte L1 does better (2) and where Luma 350 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
3.6Picture3.4
Why is ZenBeam Latte L1 better than Luma 350?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
Why is Luma 350 better than ZenBeam Latte L1?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)300 lm vs 350 lm+17%
- Weight1.3 kg vs 0.73 kg+78%
- Largest image size120″ vs 200″+67%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | LED | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 300 lm | 350 lm |
| Gaming | ||
| Game / low-latency mode | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.2:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.66 m | — |
| Smallest image size | 30″ | — |
| Largest image size | 120″ | 200″ |
| Autofocus | No | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Internal storage | — | 8 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | — |
| Power consumption | 36 W | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 30 dB | — |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 28 dB | — |
| Weight | 1.3 kg | 0.73 kg |
| Width | 90 mm | — |
| Height | 131 mm | — |
| Depth | 90 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | White |
