- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- ZenBeam Latte L1 vs NeoPix Ace
Asus ZenBeam Latte L1 vs Philips NeoPix Ace
What ZenBeam Latte L1 does better (0) and where NeoPix Ace wins (3) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.4Setup & placement2.8
Why is ZenBeam Latte L1 better than NeoPix Ace?
ZenBeam Latte L1 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is NeoPix Ace better than ZenBeam Latte L1?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 300 lm | — |
| Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens) | — | 4,200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,000:1 |
| Gaming | ||
| Game / low-latency mode | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.2:1 | 1.4:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.66 m | 3.1 m |
| Smallest image size | 30″ | 20″ |
| Largest image size | 120″ | 120″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | No |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | Yes |
| Audio output | No | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | — |
| Power consumption | 36 W | — |
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 30 dB | — |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 28 dB | — |
| Weight | 1.3 kg | — |
| Width | 90 mm | — |
| Height | 131 mm | — |
| Depth | 90 mm | — |
| Colours | Black | Silver, Black |
