How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Boom 3 vs Cube 600

Aurzen Boom 3 vs BladeCine Cube 600

What Boom 3 does better (1) and where Cube 600 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Aurzen Boom 3
Aurzen · 2025Boom 3
9.2Score
1 advantage≈ US$290
vs
BladeCine Cube 600
BladeCine · 2025Cube 600
9.6Score
3 advantages≈ US$200
Higher score
7.8Picture8.2
7.3Setup & placement9.1

Why is Boom 3 better than Cube 600?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)36 W vs 20 W+80%

Why is Cube 600 better than Boom 3?

  1. Automatic keystone correctionNo · Boom 3: Yes
  2. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)500 lm vs 600 lm+20%
  3. Ethernet (LAN)No · Boom 3: Yes
Specifications

Side by side

Aurzen Boom 3Aurzen Boom 3≈ US$2909.2
BladeCine Cube 600BladeCine Cube 600≈ US$2009.6
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)500 lm600 lm
HDR supportYesYes
HDR formatsHDR10+, HDR10HDR10
Lens & placement
Throw ratio—1.39:1
Throw type—Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image—3.08 m
Smallest image size—50″
Largest image size200″200″
Lens shiftNoneNone
AutofocusYes—
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoYes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)36 W20 W
Smart & streaming
Built-in smart platformYes—
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
Internal storage16 GB—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs22
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoYes
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Design & noise
Fan noise—26 dB
Weight—3.5 kg
Width—272 mm
Height—241 mm
Depth—187 mm
ColoursBlack—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare