How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. Boom 3 vs NeoPix 460

Aurzen Boom 3 vs Philips NeoPix 460

What Boom 3 does better (2) and where NeoPix 460 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Aurzen Boom 3
Aurzen · 2025Boom 3
9.2Score
2 advantages≈ US$290
Higher score
vs
Philips NeoPix 460
Philips · 2026NeoPix 460
0 advantages≈ US$270
7.8Picture7.9

Why is Boom 3 better than NeoPix 460?

  1. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×
  2. Audio outputYes · NeoPix 460: No

Why is NeoPix 460 better than Boom 3?

NeoPix 460 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Aurzen Boom 3Aurzen Boom 3≈ US$2909.2
Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technology—LCD (single panel)
Light sourceLEDLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)500 lm500 lm
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10+, HDR10—
Lens & placement
Largest image size200″—
Lens shiftNone—
AutofocusYes—
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)36 W—
Smart & streaming
Built-in smart platformYes—
Wi-FiYes—
BluetoothYes—
Internal storage16 GB—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs21
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life—500 h
Design & noise
ColoursBlackBlack
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare