- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- E1R vs NeoPix 106
Aurzen E1R vs Philips NeoPix 106
What E1R does better (4) and where NeoPix 106 wins (4) — every spec side by side.
vs
2.7Picture3.0
6.8Setup & placement5.8
Why is E1R better than NeoPix 106?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)150 lm vs 60 lm2.5×
- AutofocusYes · NeoPix 106: No
- Largest image size120″ vs 50″2.4×
- Weight0.45 kg vs 0.51 kg+13%
Why is NeoPix 106 better than E1R?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Automatic keystone correctionNo · E1R: Yes
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Audio outputNo · E1R: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | — | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 150 lm | 60 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 500:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | HDR10 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.1:1 | 1.2:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.44 m | 2.66 m |
| Largest image size | 120″ | 50″ |
| Lens shift | None | None |
| Autofocus | Yes | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 2 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | — |
| Light source life | — | 30,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 0.45 kg | 0.51 kg |
| Width | — | 158 mm |
| Height | — | 73 mm |
| Depth | — | 121 mm |
| Colours | White | White |
