- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- EAZZE D1 vs CC200
Aurzen EAZZE D1 vs HP CC200
What EAZZE D1 does better (2) and where CC200 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is EAZZE D1 better than CC200?
- Largest image size200″ vs 80″2.5×
- Audio outputYes · CC200: No
Why is CC200 better than EAZZE D1?
CC200 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | 4K input only (downscaled) | — |
| Display technology | LCD (single panel) | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | LED | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 200 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 1,200:1 | — |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| HDR formats | HDR10 | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | — | 1.4:1 |
| Throw type | — | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | — | 3.1 m |
| Smallest image size | 50″ | 45″ |
| Largest image size | 200″ | 80″ |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Autofocus | Yes | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic screen fit | Yes | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 16 W | — |
| Dolby Audio / Dolby Digital Plus | Yes | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | Yes | — |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| Internal storage | 8 GB | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | No |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | — | 20,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 37 dB | — |
| Width | — | 128 mm |
| Height | — | 203 mm |
| Depth | — | 136 mm |
| Colours | White | Yellow |
