How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. AH500ST vs KM0370-FHD

BenQ AH500ST vs Krüger & Matz KM0370-FHD

What AH500ST does better (2) and where KM0370-FHD wins (1) — every spec side by side.

BenQ AH500ST
BenQ · 2026AH500ST
6.1Score
2 advantages
Higher score
vs
Krüger & Matz KM0370-FHD
Krüger & Matz · 2026KM0370-FHD
1 advantage≈ US$120
Dimensions

Size comparison

AH500STKM0370-FHD
320 × 131255306 × 127208
AH500STKM0370-FHDDifference
Height131 mm127 mm+4 mm
Width320 mm306 mm+14 mm
Depth255 mm208 mm+47 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is AH500ST better than KM0370-FHD?

  1. Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 3 W3.3×
  2. HDMI inputs2 vs 12×

Why is KM0370-FHD better than AH500ST?

  1. Light source life20,000 h vs 50,000 h2.5×
Specifications

Side by side

Picture
Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
Display technologyDLP—
Light sourceLaser—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)4,000 lm—
Claimed brightness (LED / light-source lumens)—5,000 lm
Native contrast ratio3,000,000:1—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—1,000:1
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10, HLG—
Colour gamut (Rec.709)83%—
Gaming
Input lag16.7 ms—
Maximum refresh rate120 Hz—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio0.5:1—
Throw typeShort throw (0.4–1.0:1)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image1.11 m—
Smallest image size—15″
Largest image size—150″
Autofocus—No
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W3 W
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—No
Bluetooth—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs21
USB portNoYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoYes
Audio outputNoNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption250 W—
Light source life20,000 h50,000 h
Design & noise
Width320 mm306 mm
Height131 mm127 mm
Depth255 mm208 mm
ColoursBlackWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare