- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- GS2 vs Luma 350
BenQ GS2 vs Kodak Luma 350
What GS2 does better (3) and where Luma 350 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Why is GS2 better than Luma 350?
- Resolution (on screen)1280 × 720 (HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)500 lm vs 350 lm+43%
- Native panel resolution1280 × 720 (HD) vs 854 × 480 (480p)
Why is Luma 350 better than GS2?
- Weight1.6 kg vs 0.73 kg2.2×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Native panel resolution | 1280 × 720 (HD) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | LED | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 500 lm | 350 lm |
| Native contrast ratio | 100,000:1 | — |
| Colour gamut (Rec.709) | 98% | — |
| Gaming | ||
| Input lag | 33.4 ms | — |
| Maximum refresh rate | 85 Hz | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.3:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.88 m | — |
| Largest image size | — | 200″ |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 4 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | — | Android (not TV-certified) |
| Built-in smart platform | — | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Internal storage | — | 8 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | — | No |
| Audio output | — | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Built-in battery | Yes | — |
| Power consumption | 42 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 31 dB | — |
| Weight | 1.6 kg | 0.73 kg |
| Width | 139 mm | — |
| Height | 144 mm | — |
| Depth | 139 mm | — |
| Colours | — | White |
