- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- GV11 vs Luma 150
BenQ GV11 vs Kodak Luma 150
What GV11 does better (3) and where Luma 150 wins (0) — every spec side by side.
Why is GV11 better than Luma 150?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 150 lm+33%
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)100,000:1 vs 1,500:166.7×
- Audio outputYes · Luma 150: No
Why is Luma 150 better than GV11?
Luma 150 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 854 × 480 (480p) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Native panel resolution | 854 × 480 (480p) | 854 × 480 (480p) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | LED | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 200 lm | 150 lm |
| Native contrast ratio | 100,000:1 | — |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 100,000:1 | 1,500:1 |
| Colour gamut (Rec.709) | 92% | — |
| Gaming | ||
| Input lag | 51 ms | — |
| Maximum refresh rate | 60 Hz | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.3:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.88 m | — |
| Largest image size | — | 150″ |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 5 W | — |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Smart platform | Android TV | — |
| Built-in smart platform | Yes | — |
| Wi-Fi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | — |
| AirPlay | Yes | — |
| Chromecast built-in | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 28 W | — |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Weight | 0.97 kg | — |
| Width | 114 mm | — |
| Height | 153 mm | — |
| Depth | 140 mm | — |
