How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. GV11 vs Luma 350

BenQ GV11 vs Kodak Luma 350

What GV11 does better (1) and where Luma 350 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

BenQ GV11
BenQ · 2022GV11
4.1Score
1 advantage≈ US$360
Higher score
vs
Kodak Luma 350
Kodak · 2020Luma 350
2 advantages≈ US$400
3.9Picture3.4

Why is GV11 better than Luma 350?

  1. Audio outputYes · Luma 350: No

Why is Luma 350 better than GV11?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm vs 350 lm+75%
  2. Weight0.97 kg vs 0.73 kg+33%
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ GV11BenQ GV11≈ US$3604.1
Kodak Luma 350Kodak Luma 350≈ US$400
Picture
Resolution (on screen)854 × 480 (480p)854 × 480 (480p)
Native panel resolution854 × 480 (480p)854 × 480 (480p)
Display technologyDLP—
Light sourceLED—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)200 lm350 lm
Native contrast ratio100,000:1—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)100,000:1—
Colour gamut (Rec.709)92%—
Gaming
Input lag51 ms—
Maximum refresh rate60 Hz—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.3:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.88 m—
Largest image size—200″
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionYes—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)5 W—
Smart & streaming
Smart platformAndroid TVAndroid (not TV-certified)
Built-in smart platformYesYes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesYes
AirPlayYes—
Chromecast built-inYes—
Internal storage—8 GB
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoNo
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesNo
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption28 W—
Light source life20,000 h—
Design & noise
Weight0.97 kg0.73 kg
Width114 mm—
Height153 mm—
Depth140 mm—
Colours—White
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare