How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. HT2550 vs TK800

BenQ HT2550 vs BenQ TK800

What HT2550 does better (0) and where TK800 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

BenQ HT2550
BenQ · 2018HT2550
0 advantages≈ US$900
vs
BenQ TK800
BenQ · 2018TK800
4.4Score
2 advantages
Higher score
5.5Picture6.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

HT2550TK800
353 × 135272353 × 135272
HT2550TK800Difference
Height135 mm135 mm=
Width353 mm353 mm=
Depth272 mm272 mm=
Weight4.2 kg4.2 kg=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is HT2550 better than TK800?

HT2550 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is TK800 better than HT2550?

  1. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,200 lm vs 3,000 lm+36%
  2. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ HT2550BenQ HT2550≈ US$900
Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method4K by pixel shifting4K by pixel shifting
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLamp—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,200 lm3,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—10,000:1
HDR supportYesYes
3D playbackYesYes
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate—120 Hz
Game / low-latency modeYesYes
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.47:11.47:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.76:11.76:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.25 m3.25 m
Smallest image size—60″
Largest image size—300″
Optical zoom1.2×1.2×
Lens shift—None
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—5 W
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
HDMI version—2
USB port—Yes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA inputYesYes
Audio output—Yes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—385 W
Light source life—4,000 h
Light source life (eco mode)—10,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise33 dB33 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)—29 dB
Weight4.2 kg4.2 kg
Width353 mm353 mm
Height135 mm135 mm
Depth272 mm272 mm
Colours—Blue, White
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare