- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- HT2550 vs TK800M
BenQ HT2550 vs BenQ TK800M
What HT2550 does better (1) and where TK800M wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
HT2550TK800M
| HT2550 | TK800M | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 135 mm | 135 mm | = |
| Width | 353 mm | 353 mm | = |
| Depth | 272 mm | 272 mm | = |
| Weight | 4.2 kg | 4.2 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is HT2550 better than TK800M?
- Optical zoom1.2× vs 1.1×+9%
Why is TK800M better than HT2550?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,200 lm vs 3,000 lm+36%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Lamp | Lamp |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 2,200 lm | 3,000 lm |
| HDR support | Yes | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10, HLG |
| 3D playback | Yes | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Game / low-latency mode | Yes | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.47:1 | 1.5:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.76:1 | 1.65:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.25 m | 3.32 m |
| Optical zoom | 1.2× | 1.1× |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| VGA input | Yes | Yes |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 33 dB | 33 dB |
| Weight | 4.2 kg | 4.2 kg |
| Width | 353 mm | 353 mm |
| Height | 135 mm | 135 mm |
| Depth | 272 mm | 272 mm |
