- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- HT2550 vs PX725HD
BenQ HT2550 vs ViewSonic PX725HD
What HT2550 does better (3) and where PX725HD wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is HT2550 better than PX725HD?
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,200 lm vs 2,000 lm+10%
- Fan noise33 dB vs 34 dB+3%
Why is PX725HD better than HT2550?
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Weight4.2 kg vs 2.94 kg+43%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | — |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Lamp | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 2,200 lm | 2,000 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 22,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | — |
| 3D playback | Yes | — |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | — | 120 Hz |
| Game / low-latency mode | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.47:1 | — |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.76:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.25 m | — |
| Optical zoom | 1.2× | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 8 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| HDMI version | — | 1.4 |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | — | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 310 W |
| Light source life | — | 3,500 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | — | 7,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 33 dB | 34 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | — | 30 dB |
| Weight | 4.2 kg | 2.94 kg |
| Width | 353 mm | — |
| Height | 135 mm | — |
| Depth | 272 mm | — |
| Colours | — | White |
