How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. HT2550 vs PX727-4K

BenQ HT2550 vs ViewSonic PX727-4K

What HT2550 does better (0) and where PX727-4K wins (1) — every spec side by side.

BenQ HT2550
BenQ · 2018HT2550
0 advantages≈ US$900
vs
ViewSonic PX727-4K
ViewSonic · 2018PX727-4K
4.0Score
1 advantage
Higher score
5.5Picture5.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

HT2550PX727-4K
353 × 135272332 × 135261
HT2550PX727-4KDifference
Height135 mm135 mm=
Width353 mm332 mm+21 mm
Depth272 mm261 mm+11 mm
Weight4.2 kg4.2 kg=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is HT2550 better than PX727-4K?

HT2550 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is PX727-4K better than HT2550?

  1. HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ HT2550BenQ HT2550≈ US$900
Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method4K by pixel shifting4K by pixel shifting
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLamp—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)2,200 lm2,200 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—12,000:1
HDR supportYesYes
3D playbackYes—
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate—120 Hz
Game / low-latency modeYesYes
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.47:11.5:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.76:11.8:1
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.25 m3.32 m
Smallest image size—30″
Largest image size—300″
Optical zoom1.2×1.2×
Lens shift—None
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionNoNo
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)—10 W
Connectivity
HDMI inputs12
USB port—Yes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA inputYesYes
Audio output—Yes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption—310 W
Light source life—4,000 h
Light source life (eco mode)—15,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise33 dB33 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)—27 dB
Weight4.2 kg4.2 kg
Width353 mm332 mm
Height135 mm135 mm
Depth272 mm261 mm
Colours—White
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare