- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- TH575C vs IN0048SL
BenQ TH575C vs InFocus IN0048SL
What TH575C does better (1) and where IN0048SL wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TH575CIN0048SL
| TH575C | IN0048SL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 120 mm | 236 mm | −116 mm |
| Width | 296 mm | 313 mm | −17 mm |
| Depth | 237 mm | 96 mm | +141 mm |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.9 kg | −0.6 kg |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TH575C better than IN0048SL?
- Weight2.3 kg vs 2.9 kg+26%
Why is IN0048SL better than TH575C?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,800 lm vs 4,400 lm+16%
- Fan noise34 dB vs 27 dB+26%
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | — | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Lamp | Lamp |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 3,800 lm | 4,400 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 30,000:1 |
| 3D playback | Yes | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Game / low-latency mode | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.49:1 | 1.13:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.64:1 | 1.47:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.3 m | 2.5 m |
| Optical zoom | 1.1× | — |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Autofocus | — | No |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 10 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| HDMI version | — | 1.4 |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | Yes |
| VGA input | — | Yes |
| Audio output | — | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 267 W |
| Light source life | — | 15,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 34 dB | 27 dB |
| Weight | 2.3 kg | 2.9 kg |
| Width | 296 mm | 313 mm |
| Height | 120 mm | 236 mm |
| Depth | 237 mm | 96 mm |
| Colours | — | White |
