- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- TH585 vs PX725HD
BenQ TH585 vs ViewSonic PX725HD
What TH585 does better (5) and where PX725HD wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is TH585 better than PX725HD?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,500 lm vs 2,000 lm+75%
- Built-in speakers (total output)10 W vs 8 W+25%
- Light source life4,000 h vs 3,500 h+14%
- Weight2.79 kg vs 2.94 kg+5%
- Power consumption297 W vs 310 W+4%
Why is PX725HD better than TH585?
- Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)10,000:1 vs 22,000:12.2×
- Fan noise35 dB vs 34 dB+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 3,500 lm | 2,000 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | 10,000:1 | 22,000:1 |
| HDR support | No | — |
| 3D playback | Yes | — |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Game / low-latency mode | Yes | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.5:1 | — |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.65:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.32 m | — |
| Optical zoom | 1.1× | — |
| Lens shift | None | — |
| Keystone correction | Yes | — |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | — |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 10 W | 8 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| HDMI version | — | 1.4 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 297 W | 310 W |
| Light source life | 4,000 h | 3,500 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | — | 7,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 35 dB | 34 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 29 dB | 30 dB |
| Weight | 2.79 kg | 2.94 kg |
| Width | 312 mm | — |
| Height | 110 mm | — |
| Depth | 225 mm | — |
| Colours | White | White |
