- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- TH685P vs FHD5000
BenQ TH685P vs Celexon FHD5000
What TH685P does better (1) and where FHD5000 wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is TH685P better than FHD5000?
- Largest image size300″ vs 135″2.2×
Why is FHD5000 better than TH685P?
- Light source life4,000 h vs 30,000 h7.5×
- Built-in speakers (total output)5 W vs 10 W2×
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | Lamp | LED |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 100,000:1 |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.13:1 | 1.35:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.46:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.5 m | 2.99 m |
| Smallest image size | 30″ | — |
| Largest image size | 300″ | 135″ |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Keystone correction | — | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | — | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 5 W | 10 W |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB-C video input | Yes | — |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 130 W |
| Light source life | 4,000 h | 30,000 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | 10,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 35 dB | — |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 29 dB | — |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 2.75 kg |
| Width | 312 mm | — |
| Height | 110 mm | — |
| Depth | 225 mm | — |
| Colours | White | Black, White |
