- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- TH685P vs CC200
BenQ TH685P vs HP CC200
What TH685P does better (2) and where CC200 wins (1) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
TH685PCC200
| TH685P | CC200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 110 mm | 203 mm | −93 mm |
| Width | 312 mm | 128 mm | +184 mm |
| Depth | 225 mm | 136 mm | +89 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is TH685P better than CC200?
- Largest image size300″ vs 80″3.8×
- Audio outputYes · CC200: No
Why is CC200 better than TH685P?
- Light source life4,000 h vs 20,000 h5×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | LCD (single panel) |
| Light source | Lamp | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 200 lm |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.13:1 | 1.4:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.46:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.5 m | 3.1 m |
| Smallest image size | 30″ | 45″ |
| Largest image size | 300″ | 80″ |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 5 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C video input | Yes | — |
| USB port | Yes | No |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 4,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | 10,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 35 dB | — |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 29 dB | — |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | — |
| Width | 312 mm | 128 mm |
| Height | 110 mm | 203 mm |
| Depth | 225 mm | 136 mm |
| Colours | White | Yellow |
