- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- TH685P vs DLA-NZ9
BenQ TH685P vs JVC DLA-NZ9
What TH685P does better (2) and where DLA-NZ9 wins (6) — every spec side by side.
Why is TH685P better than DLA-NZ9?
- Weight2.8 kg vs 25 kg8.9×
- Audio outputYes · DLA-NZ9: No
Why is DLA-NZ9 better than TH685P?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K)
- Light source life4,000 h vs 20,000 h5×
- Fan noise35 dB vs 24 dB+46%
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K)
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
- Ethernet (LAN)No · TH685P: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 4096 × 2160 (DCI 4K) |
| 4K method | — | Native 4K |
| Display technology | DLP | LCoS (SXRD / D-ILA) |
| Light source | Lamp | Laser |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 100,000:1 |
| HDR support | — | Yes |
| HDR formats | — | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | — | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.13:1 | — |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.46:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | — |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.5 m | — |
| Smallest image size | 30″ | 60″ |
| Largest image size | 300″ | 300″ |
| Lens shift | — | Vertical and horizontal |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 5 W | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB-C video input | Yes | — |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | Yes |
| VGA input | Yes | Yes |
| Audio output | Yes | No |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 440 W |
| Light source life | 4,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | 10,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 35 dB | 24 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 29 dB | — |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 25 kg |
| Width | 312 mm | — |
| Height | 110 mm | — |
| Depth | 225 mm | — |
| Colours | White | Blue, Yellow, Black |
