- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- TH685P vs NeoPix Prime 2
BenQ TH685P vs Philips NeoPix Prime 2
What TH685P does better (4) and where NeoPix Prime 2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Why is TH685P better than NeoPix Prime 2?
- Resolution (on screen)1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Largest image size300″ vs 80″3.8×
- Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 720 (HD)
- Weight2.8 kg vs 3 kg+7%
Why is NeoPix Prime 2 better than TH685P?
- Built-in speakers (total output)5 W vs 10 W2×
- HDMI inputs1 vs 22×
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1280 × 720 (HD) |
| Display technology | DLP | — |
| Light source | Lamp | LED |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | — | 180 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 3,000:1 |
| Gaming | ||
| Maximum refresh rate | 120 Hz | — |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.13:1 | 1.3:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.46:1 | — |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 2.5 m | 2.88 m |
| Smallest image size | 30″ | — |
| Largest image size | 300″ | 80″ |
| Autofocus | — | Yes |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | 5 W | 10 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| Internal storage | — | 16 GB |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 2 |
| USB-C video input | Yes | — |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | No | No |
| VGA input | Yes | Yes |
| Audio output | Yes | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Light source life | 4,000 h | — |
| Light source life (eco mode) | 10,000 h | — |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 35 dB | — |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 29 dB | — |
| Weight | 2.8 kg | 3 kg |
| Width | 312 mm | — |
| Height | 110 mm | — |
| Depth | 225 mm | — |
| Colours | White | Silver, Black |
