How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. TK700 vs DBX3 Pro

BenQ TK700 vs Dangbei DBX3 Pro

What TK700 does better (1) and where DBX3 Pro wins (0) — every spec side by side.

BenQ TK700
BenQ · 2022TK700
5.6Score
1 advantage≈ US$970
vs
Dangbei DBX3 Pro
Dangbei · 2023DBX3 Pro
9.2Score
0 advantages≈ US$1,000
Higher score
6.0Picture7.2
7.2Setup & placement8.8

Why is TK700 better than DBX3 Pro?

  1. Maximum refresh rate120 Hz vs 60 Hz2×

Why is DBX3 Pro better than TK700?

DBX3 Pro has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

BenQ TK700BenQ TK700≈ US$9705.6
Dangbei DBX3 ProDangbei DBX3 Pro≈ US$1,0009.2
Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method4K by pixel shifting4K by pixel shifting
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLamp—
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,200 lm3,200 lm
Native contrast ratio10,000:1—
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)10,000:1—
HDR supportYesYes
HDR formatsHDR10, HLGHDR10+, HLG
Colour gamut (Rec.709)96%—
3D playbackYes—
Gaming
Input lag4.2 ms—
Maximum refresh rate120 Hz60 Hz
Game / low-latency mode—Yes
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.13:1—
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.46:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.5 m—
Smallest image size30″—
Largest image size300″—
Optical zoom1.3×—
Lens shiftNone—
Keystone correctionYesYes
Automatic keystone correctionYesYes
Obstacle avoidance—Yes
Automatic screen fit—Yes
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)5 W—
Dolby Audio / Dolby Digital Plus—Yes
Dolby AtmosYes—
DTS—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs2—
HDMI version2—
HDMI eARCYes—
USB portYes—
Ethernet (LAN)No—
VGA inputNo—
Audio outputYes—
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption310 W—
Light source life4,000 h—
Light source life (eco mode)10,000 h—
Design & noise
Fan noise34 dB—
Fan noise (eco mode)28 dB—
Weight3.1 kg—
Width312 mm—
Height110 mm—
Depth246 mm—
ColoursWhite—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare