How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. TK800M vs IN1156

BenQ TK800M vs InFocus IN1156

What TK800M does better (2) and where IN1156 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

BenQ TK800M
BenQ · 2019TK800M
2 advantages≈ US$840
vs
InFocus IN1156
InFocus · 2019IN1156
6.0Score
1 advantage
Higher score
6.8Picture3.8

Why is TK800M better than IN1156?

  1. Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1280 × 800 (WXGA)
  2. Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD) vs 1280 × 800 (WXGA)

Why is IN1156 better than TK800M?

  1. Weight4.2 kg vs 2 kg2.1×
Specifications

Side by side

BenQ TK800MBenQ TK800M≈ US$840
Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)1280 × 800 (WXGA)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1280 × 800 (WXGA)
4K method4K by pixel shifting—
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light sourceLampLED
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,000 lm3,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)—1,000,000:1
HDR supportYes—
HDR formatsHDR10, HLG—
3D playbackYes—
Gaming
Maximum refresh rate—120 Hz
Game / low-latency modeYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.5:11.2:1
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.65:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer)
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image3.32 m2.66 m
Largest image size—300″
Optical zoom1.1×—
Autofocus—No
Keystone correctionYes—
Automatic keystone correctionNo—
Smart & streaming
Wi-Fi—No
AirPlay—Yes
Connectivity
HDMI inputs11
USB port—Yes
Ethernet (LAN)—No
VGA inputYesYes
Audio output—Yes
Battery, power & lifetime
Light source life—30,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise33 dB33 dB
Fan noise (eco mode)—26 dB
Weight4.2 kg2 kg
Width353 mm—
Height135 mm—
Depth272 mm—
Colours—White
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare