- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- TK800M vs HD146X
BenQ TK800M vs Optoma HD146X
What TK800M does better (2) and where HD146X wins (3) — every spec side by side.
Why is TK800M better than HD146X?
- Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) vs 1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
- HDR supportYes · HD146X: No
Why is HD146X better than TK800M?
- Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,000 lm vs 3,600 lm+20%
- Fan noise33 dB vs 26 dB+27%
- Optical zoom1.1× vs 2×+82%
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | — |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Lamp | — |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 3,000 lm | 3,600 lm |
| Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed) | — | 25,000:1 |
| HDR support | Yes | No |
| HDR formats | HDR10, HLG | — |
| 3D playback | Yes | Yes |
| Gaming | ||
| Game / low-latency mode | Yes | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Throw ratio | 1.5:1 | 1.47:1 |
| Throw ratio (zoomed in) | 1.65:1 | 1.62:1 |
| Throw type | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) | Standard throw (1.0:1 and longer) |
| Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image | 3.32 m | 3.25 m |
| Smallest image size | — | 28″ |
| Largest image size | — | 300″ |
| Optical zoom | 1.1× | 2× |
| Lens shift | — | None |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | No |
| Sound | ||
| Built-in speakers (total output) | — | 3 W |
| Smart & streaming | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 1 | 1 |
| HDMI version | — | 1.4 |
| USB port | — | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | — | No |
| VGA input | Yes | No |
| Audio output | — | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | — | 295 W |
| Light source life | — | 4,000 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | — | 10,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 33 dB | 26 dB |
| Weight | 4.2 kg | — |
| Width | 353 mm | — |
| Height | 135 mm | — |
| Depth | 272 mm | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
