How we score Blog Advertise
  1. Attenborough.film
  2. Compare
  3. TK860 vs PX749-4K

BenQ TK860 vs ViewSonic PX749-4K

What TK860 does better (2) and where PX749-4K wins (4) — every spec side by side.

BenQ TK860
BenQ · 2023TK860
4.3Score
2 advantages
Higher score
vs
ViewSonic PX749-4K
ViewSonic · 2023PX749-4K
4 advantages≈ US$1,400
7.4Picture8.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

TK860PX749-4K
380 × 127263312 × 222108
TK860PX749-4KDifference
Height127 mm222 mm−95 mm
Width380 mm312 mm+68 mm
Depth263 mm108 mm+155 mm
Weight4.2 kg3 kg+1.2 kg

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is TK860 better than PX749-4K?

  1. Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)50,000:1 vs 12,000:14.2×
  2. HDMI inputs3 vs 2+50%

Why is PX749-4K better than TK860?

  1. Light source life4,000 h vs 40,000 h10×
  2. Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,300 lm vs 4,000 lm+21%
  3. Ethernet (LAN)No · TK860: Yes
  4. Weight4.2 kg vs 3 kg+40%
Specifications

Side by side

ViewSonic PX749-4KViewSonic PX749-4K≈ US$1,400
Picture
Resolution (on screen)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)3840 × 2160 (4K UHD)
Native panel resolution1920 × 1080 (Full HD)1920 × 1080 (Full HD)
4K method4K by pixel shifting4K by pixel shifting
Display technologyDLPDLP
Light source—Lamp
Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens)3,300 lm4,000 lm
Contrast ratio (dynamic / claimed)50,000:112,000:1
HDR supportYes—
Lens & placement
Throw ratio1.13:1—
Throw ratio (zoomed in)1.47:1—
Throw typeStandard throw (1.0:1 and longer)—
Distance for a 100″ 16:9 image2.5 m—
Largest image size300″—
Optical zoom1.3×—
Lens shiftNone—
Sound
Built-in speakers (total output)10 W—
Connectivity
HDMI inputs32
HDMI version—2
USB portYesYes
Ethernet (LAN)NoYes
VGA inputNoNo
Audio outputYesYes
Battery, power & lifetime
Power consumption330 W—
Light source life4,000 h40,000 h
Light source life (eco mode)10,000 h20,000 h
Design & noise
Fan noise (eco mode)28 dB—
Weight4.2 kg3 kg
Width380 mm312 mm
Height127 mm222 mm
Depth263 mm108 mm
ColoursWhite, BlueWhite
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare