- Attenborough.film
- Compare
- W5800 vs W5850
BenQ W5800 vs BenQ W5850
What W5800 does better (0) and where W5850 wins (2) — every spec side by side.
Dimensions
Size comparison
W5800W5850
| W5800 | W5850 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 145 mm | 145 mm | = |
| Width | 525 mm | 525 mm | = |
| Depth | 392 mm | 392 mm | = |
| Weight | 10.1 kg | 10.1 kg | = |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is W5800 better than W5850?
W5800 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is W5850 better than W5800?
- Lens shiftVertical vs Vertical and horizontal
- Audio outputNo · W5800: Yes
Specifications
Side by side
| Picture | ||
| Resolution (on screen) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) | 3840 × 2160 (4K UHD) |
| Native panel resolution | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) | 1920 × 1080 (Full HD) |
| 4K method | 4K by pixel shifting | 4K by pixel shifting |
| Display technology | DLP | DLP |
| Light source | Laser | Laser |
| Brightness (ANSI / ISO lumens) | 2,600 lm | 2,600 lm |
| HDR support | Yes | Yes |
| HDR formats | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG |
| Motion interpolation (MEMC) | — | Yes |
| Lens & placement | ||
| Smallest image size | — | 60″ |
| Largest image size | — | 300″ |
| Optical zoom | — | 1.6× |
| Lens shift | Vertical | Vertical and horizontal |
| Keystone correction | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic keystone correction | No | No |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI inputs | 2 | 2 |
| USB port | Yes | Yes |
| Ethernet (LAN) | Yes | Yes |
| VGA input | No | No |
| Audio output | No | Yes |
| Battery, power & lifetime | ||
| Power consumption | 380 W | 380 W |
| Light source life | 20,000 h | 20,000 h |
| Light source life (eco mode) | 25,000 h | 25,000 h |
| Design & noise | ||
| Fan noise | 30 dB | 30 dB |
| Fan noise (eco mode) | 27 dB | 27 dB |
| Weight | 10.1 kg | 10.1 kg |
| Width | 525 mm | 525 mm |
| Height | 145 mm | 145 mm |
| Depth | 392 mm | 392 mm |
| Colours | Black | Black |
